For review: PEP 308 - If-then-else expression
Fernando Perez
fperez528 at yahoo.com
Fri Feb 7 18:40:42 EST 2003
More information about the Python-list mailing list
Fri Feb 7 18:40:42 EST 2003
- Previous message (by thread): For review: PEP 308 - If-then-else expression
- Next message (by thread): For review: PEP 308 - If-then-else expression
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Guido van Rossum wrote: > > PEP: 308 > Title: If-then-else expression +1. After being spending 95% of my programming time in python for the last year and a half, the lack of a ternary operator is probably one of the very few things (if not the only one) which REALLY pisses me off about the language. I love python and proselytize it heavily, but this bothers me to no end. I find to be an affront to competent programmers to be forced to be over-verbose to death (if/then/else in multiple lines) or absurdly obscure (all the and/or/[] tricks). Pretty much everything else I initially labelled as a personal 'wart' in the language, I soon realized was my own forcing my old ways (C/Perl) onto python instead of learning python's own way. But this one, I just can't shake it off. So I for one am super-super happy to see it go in (if it does indeed). At least I can cast my vote. Cheers, f.
- Previous message (by thread): For review: PEP 308 - If-then-else expression
- Next message (by thread): For review: PEP 308 - If-then-else expression
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the Python-list mailing list