PEP 308: Alternative conditional operator forms
Christos TZOTZIOY Georgiou
DLNXPEGFQVEB at spammotel.com
Tue Feb 11 08:01:50 EST 2003
More information about the Python-list mailing list
Tue Feb 11 08:01:50 EST 2003
- Previous message (by thread): PEP 308: Alternative conditional operator forms
- Next message (by thread): PEP 308: Alternative conditional operator forms
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
On 10 Feb 2003 23:41:08 -0500, rumours say that Nick Vargish <nav at adams.patriot.net> might have written: >Darnit. I knew I should have read the whole thread before piping up. Nick, this is not my idea either; it was mentioned in the initial PEP by Guido as if C then x else y only to be rejected for ambiguity; my remark (and others') is that the 'if' can be dropped, while 'then' needs not be a keyword (ie it pops up in the middle of an expression, and look-ahead of depth 1 in Python's parser allows special use of 'then' only in expressions). However, I don't mind. I'm +0 anyway. If a ternary conditional operator is there, I'll use it (heck, I don't mind even the 'x if C else y') instead of "C and x or y" with its one glitch. Why so much fuss, anyway? I've been a C programmer for years, and I used its ternary operator often (when I thought it appropriate); my coding style was always dense (see patch 681780, as an example of Python code that is not so obvious but is fast; I guess it will probably be dropped though), being kind of a 'lone wolf' for years, and I based the readability of my code on comments (ie, "this block does this; now move on to the next block"). I am aware of the problems dense code creates when co-operating with people, and the readability of Python was one of the things that enchanted me with the language. So I'm still learning to code in a more readable way (I never did any XP so far). The only reason to be on the plus side to add a "clear" ternary conditional operator in python, is because the and-or trick already exists. For someone who owned a ZX Spectrum (like me), it is familiar; it is not for a newbie. Guido must be getting mellow. Or old. Or wise. Or all of the above. :) -- TZOTZIOY, I speak England very best, Real email address: 'dHpvdEBzaWwtdGVjLmdy\n'.decode('base64')
- Previous message (by thread): PEP 308: Alternative conditional operator forms
- Next message (by thread): PEP 308: Alternative conditional operator forms
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the Python-list mailing list