For review: PEP 308 - If-then-else expression
Andrew Koenig
ark at research.att.com
Fri Feb 7 18:28:11 EST 2003
More information about the Python-list mailing list
Fri Feb 7 18:28:11 EST 2003
- Previous message (by thread): For review: PEP 308 - If-then-else expression
- Next message (by thread): For review: PEP 308 - If-then-else expression
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Steven> On 2/7/03 3:22 PM, "Gerrit Holl" <gerrit at nl.linux.org> wrote: >> IMHO, since else is obliged, 'x if a' is not allowed but 'x if a else None' >> is, which is not intuitive. Steven> I would agree here that "else" definitely should not be Steven> obligatory. The "else None" should be implied if the else is Steven> missing. But then you have to figure out the meaning of a if b if c else d Does it mean (a if b) if c else d which would be equivalent to (a if b else None) if c else d or does it mean a if (b if c) else d which would be equivalent to a if (b if c else none) else d This ambiguity goes away if every "if" must have a corresponding "else". -- Andrew Koenig, ark at research.att.com, http://www.research.att.com/info/ark
- Previous message (by thread): For review: PEP 308 - If-then-else expression
- Next message (by thread): For review: PEP 308 - If-then-else expression
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the Python-list mailing list