GUI-apps creation library
pedro alvarez
dickerc6 at hotmail.com
Thu Feb 6 10:57:26 EST 2003
More information about the Python-list mailing list
Thu Feb 6 10:57:26 EST 2003
- Previous message (by thread): GUI-apps creation library
- Next message (by thread): GUI-apps creation library
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Nicolay Vasiliev <n.vasiliev at apatit.com> wrote in message news:<b1t0re$1fnv$1 at bull.east.ru>... > Hello there! > > Which subject library people preffer? I know about wxPython, FXPy, PyQT. > Which is more functional/convenient/understandable? > Depends on your intentions: I faced the same dilema, so i downloaded and played with them for a few days. PyQt is the most feature rich one, and looks great, but if you want to use it in ms windows, you have to purchase a Qt licsense.(although there is now a project to port Qt for linux to windows using cygwin). http://kde-cygwin.sourceforge.net/ So probably, PyQt is ideal choice for linux only. WxPython is what i currently use, because i use ms windows. It is very functional, looks good and free to use on all platforms, and i highly recommend it. Tkinter is probably the most documented and mature toolkit, but once i played with wxPython and PyQt, i realised it didnt look very nice. others: Well, i never used Fxpy nor pyFLTK, but i know that the c++ libraries Fox and Fltk were created for writing basic functionality, resource friendly and fast applications. So they dont look polished, but are probably the speediest. Theoritical: It would be nice having XUL for python, based on my experiences of playing with mozilla. (yes, at the moment i have lots of time to play, because i am sadly underemployed)
- Previous message (by thread): GUI-apps creation library
- Next message (by thread): GUI-apps creation library
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the Python-list mailing list