PEP308: Yet another syntax proposal
Alexander Schmolck
a.schmolck at gmx.net
Mon Feb 10 21:08:18 EST 2003
More information about the Python-list mailing list
Mon Feb 10 21:08:18 EST 2003
- Previous message (by thread): PEP308: Yet another syntax proposal
- Next message (by thread): PEP308: Yet another syntax proposal
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Erik Max Francis <max at alcyone.com> writes: > Andrew Dalke wrote: > > > True. But 1) this case in real code comes up very rarely (perhaps 1 > > in > > 5,000 lines of code, based on my analysis) ... > > You keep invoking the frequency argument. I don't find it convincing. > How often are Booleans used? metaclasses? generators? list > comprehensions? There are plenty of features in Python that _are > already present_ that are used very rarely. But when they are used, > they do their job with flying colors. Frequency * expressivness comes close to measure the usefulness of a construct. So for something that adds near 0 expressiveness, the frequency argument is extremely convincing. alex
- Previous message (by thread): PEP308: Yet another syntax proposal
- Next message (by thread): PEP308: Yet another syntax proposal
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the Python-list mailing list