For review: PEP 308 - If-then-else expression
Erik Max Francis
max at alcyone.com
Mon Feb 10 00:22:53 EST 2003
More information about the Python-list mailing list
Mon Feb 10 00:22:53 EST 2003
- Previous message (by thread): For review: PEP 308 - If-then-else expression
- Next message (by thread): For review: PEP 308 - If-then-else expression
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Samuele Pedroni wrote: > you should see the ambiguity. It's not ambiguous in the parser sense. Since what immediately follows the `if' keyword in an if statement is an expression, the second `if' clearly starts a conditional operator, not another if statement (I mean, how could it?) It's only "ambiguous" in the sense of being deliberately obtuse that someone would use a conditional operator in the conditional expression of an if statement (say that three times fast). The same is true in any language with conditional operators; crappy code is crappy code. -- Erik Max Francis / max at alcyone.com / http://www.alcyone.com/max/ __ San Jose, CA, USA / 37 20 N 121 53 W / &tSftDotIotE / \ She glanced at her watch ... It was 9:23. \__/ James Clavell Bosskey.net: Quake III Arena / http://www.bosskey.net/q3a/ A personal guide to Quake III Arena.
- Previous message (by thread): For review: PEP 308 - If-then-else expression
- Next message (by thread): For review: PEP 308 - If-then-else expression
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the Python-list mailing list