Defending the ternary operator
Piet van Oostrum
piet at cs.uu.nl
Sat Feb 8 12:11:00 EST 2003
More information about the Python-list mailing list
Sat Feb 8 12:11:00 EST 2003
- Previous message (by thread): Defending the ternary operator
- Next message (by thread): Defending the ternary operator
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
>>>>> Anthony Baxter <anthony at interlink.com.au> (AB) wrote: >>>> Andrew Koenig wrote >> The essence of Laura's argument, I think, is that many programmers >> will not become familiary with if-expressions, as they're used only >> from time to time, which means that when they do encounter them, >> it will be a mental stumbling block. AB> There's also the point that "if" already has existing meanings. This AB> means that it's use in this rare form (at least, I'd hope it's rare; AB> if a piece of code features a large number of ternary expressions, AB> I'd question the sanity of the author), it will confuse the reader AB> even more. In all context is has a sim ilar meaning: that something depends on the condition. -- Piet van Oostrum <piet at cs.uu.nl> URL: http://www.cs.uu.nl/~piet [PGP] Private email: P.van.Oostrum at hccnet.nl
- Previous message (by thread): Defending the ternary operator
- Next message (by thread): Defending the ternary operator
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the Python-list mailing list