The "beaty" of date arithmetic
Hans-Joachim Widmaier
hjwidmaier at web.de
Mon Jan 27 11:07:42 EST 2003
More information about the Python-list mailing list
Mon Jan 27 11:07:42 EST 2003
- Previous message (by thread): The "beaty" of date arithmetic
- Next message (by thread): The "beaty" of date arithmetic
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Tim Peters <tim.one at comcast.net> wrote in message news:<mailman.1043427406.25766.python-list at python.org>... > It's actually easy to supply answers to all such puzzles, but they're more > arbitrary than compelling, and one size doesn't fit anyone. I just knew it would be misunderstood ... My problem wasn't with the fuzziness or complexity of the arithmetic itself, as I think I undestand the implications well enough. I just found this playing with tuple->list conversion and indexes (indices?) plain ugly. That was really all. ;-) > > ... > > I already compiled 2.3a1 but didn't install it as it didn't pass the > > tests. > > Which OS, which tests, etc -- if problems aren't reported, they won't get > fixed. That's pretty much the point of an alpha release <wink>. Linux, home-grown (LFS). Don't remember exactly what went wrong, but afair it wasn't with the interpreter itself. More like "bsddb not found" (I have it installed). Before whining, I wanted to look for the exact reason, but haven't found the time yet. Sorry. If I find a real bug I'll certainly file a bug report. Hans-Joachim
- Previous message (by thread): The "beaty" of date arithmetic
- Next message (by thread): The "beaty" of date arithmetic
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the Python-list mailing list