Python vs. C++ Builder - speed of development
Ganesan R
rganesan at myrealbox.com
Thu Jan 30 05:02:34 EST 2003
More information about the Python-list mailing list
Thu Jan 30 05:02:34 EST 2003
- Previous message (by thread): Python vs. C++ Builder - speed of development
- Next message (by thread): Python vs. C++ Builder - speed of development
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
>>>>> "Brandon" == Brandon Van Every <vanevery at 3DProgrammer.com> writes: > Simon Wittber (Maptek) wrote: >> Hmmmmm... >> >>> Brandon Van Every wrote: >>>> I see no primary purpose for Python's existence other than as a >>>> glue language. >> >> An obvious troll. Appears to be a successful one too! > A person of no use because he writes off anything aberrant as "troll." > Goodbye! > Man, I am so sick of Usenet. Why do I bother? Oh, I remember now... my > eyes are glazing over after all the C++ code I've been writing. I'm > laboring under the delusion that this "break" somehow helps. Come on, what did you expect? Every one to applaud you? I have programmed in C++ for over five years and in Java for the last year or two. I am a pretty good Perl programmer too. I am recently into python and beginning to appreciate the language a lot; especially in relation to Java. IMHO your comment deserves the flames it got. Ganesan -- Ganesan R
- Previous message (by thread): Python vs. C++ Builder - speed of development
- Next message (by thread): Python vs. C++ Builder - speed of development
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the Python-list mailing list