Compare Python with Perl for QA purpose
Bjorn Pettersen
BPettersen at NAREX.com
Sat Jan 4 11:06:34 EST 2003
More information about the Python-list mailing list
Sat Jan 4 11:06:34 EST 2003
- Previous message (by thread): Program using gnosis utils cannot be py2exe'ed?
- Next message (by thread): Compare Python with Perl for QA purpose
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
> From: Amol Sonaikar [mailto:amol at kenati.com] > > Hi all > > I am using Python to test the Our created Command Line > Interface. I would > like to know whether Python will be better option to work on > it or Perl. I > guess the python users can very well elaborate on it. Isn't this the canonical use case for Expect, i.e. Tcl? Python has of course developed features in that direction to, although still not quite as polished from what I understand (never used them myself, i.e. this is hearsay <wink>). In any case, your question should probably be: "Is either Perl or Python close enough to Tcl/Expect functionality to test our CLI and do they have other properties that would make up for any lack of specific features?" The answer, of course, depends on what your requirements are... just-my-0.02-etc-etc'ly y'rs -- bjorn
- Previous message (by thread): Program using gnosis utils cannot be py2exe'ed?
- Next message (by thread): Compare Python with Perl for QA purpose
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the Python-list mailing list