Something like asynchronous XML-RPC possible?
Martin v. Löwis
martin at v.loewis.de
Sun Jan 26 05:34:19 EST 2003
More information about the Python-list mailing list
Sun Jan 26 05:34:19 EST 2003
- Previous message (by thread): Something like asynchronous XML-RPC possible?
- Next message (by thread): Something like asynchronous XML-RPC possible?
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
hwlgw at hotmail.com (Will Stuyvesant) writes: > 1) A caller must be able to continue immediately after issuing an > event: no blocking waiting for a return value > > 2) Language interoperability. Preferably using an international > standard. This is what XML-RPC is good at. The whole thing will be > based on components written in different languages (Python, C, Java, > ...). For now XML-RPC is even better than SOAP because the SOAP > standard is fluctuating. > > > 3) Speed. This will always be limited by today's state of the art in > technology, but for example starting a new thread to do a normal > synchronous XML-RPC call will meet strong opposition. Strictly interpreted, these two requirements may narrow the options to CORBA only: If it is not acceptable that a reply is sent, then you cannot use XML-RPC (which isn't an international standard, either), since XML-RPC *does* include mandatory replies. So if you want true oneway operations, CORBA is pretty much your only choice. Regards, Martin
- Previous message (by thread): Something like asynchronous XML-RPC possible?
- Next message (by thread): Something like asynchronous XML-RPC possible?
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the Python-list mailing list