license question
Terry Hancock
hancock at anansispaceworks.com
Sun Jan 19 17:52:59 EST 2003
More information about the Python-list mailing list
Sun Jan 19 17:52:59 EST 2003
- Previous message (by thread): License question
- Next message (by thread): license question
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Arthur wrote: > Would the practice of silently overwriting a file that is part of the > standard Python distribution in any way constitute a violation of the > Python license. No. It definitely is not. And trying to go after another developer because you don't like the way their package installs is itself, "at the minimum, ill-mannered". ;-) If you don't like it, don't use it. You already recommended a change to the developer, that's about all you can do. Or you can: 1 Recommend that users not use the 3rd party package. 2 Recommend that they apply a patch to it (which you provide in your distribution). 3 Fork the 3rd party package and maintain it yourself with the change. 4 Figure out how to live with the way the package works now, and write a work-around into your code. I'd probably opt for #2 or possibly #4, based on the small amount of information you've posted about the problem. Cheers, Terry -- Anansi Spaceworks http://www.anansispaceworks.com
- Previous message (by thread): License question
- Next message (by thread): license question
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the Python-list mailing list