Python vs. C++ Builder - speed of development
pu
pu at myRealBox.com
Thu Jan 30 12:20:27 EST 2003
More information about the Python-list mailing list
Thu Jan 30 12:20:27 EST 2003
- Previous message (by thread): Python vs. C++ Builder - speed of development
- Next message (by thread): Python vs. C++ Builder - speed of development
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Hi, as the "original poster", my personal conclusion is that a C++RAD would be more "productive" as Python with a GUI library - if my application is supposed to do a lot of GUI stuff - and when the application has a "basic" logical flow. But Alex's arguments could be mine; I do not think graphically, so maybe it would'nt even be the case for me. Thanks for saving me 3000$ and for all your answers (well, for most of them...) ;-)
- Previous message (by thread): Python vs. C++ Builder - speed of development
- Next message (by thread): Python vs. C++ Builder - speed of development
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the Python-list mailing list