mention of books & extensions welcome, or...? (was Re: Scripting *of* Python)
Paul Rubin
phr-n2003b at NOSPAMnightsong.com
Fri Jan 31 12:42:28 EST 2003
More information about the Python-list mailing list
Fri Jan 31 12:42:28 EST 2003
- Previous message (by thread): mention of books & extensions welcome, or...? (was Re: Scripting *of* Python)
- Next message (by thread): mention of books & extensions welcome, or...? (was Re: Scripting *of* Python)
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Alex Martelli <aleax at aleax.it> writes: > Is this just an isolated opinion, with most readers still welcoming > mentions and details about Python books and extension packages; or, > has comp.lang.python's consensus shifted so drastically, so fast, so > that such mentions are now seen as undesirable "product > placement"??? > > I would like to know, because, if the latter is indeed the case, > then I can simply omit posting anything that mentions any Python > book or third-party extension -- e.g. "this is covered in the > Nutshell", "Holden's book has a good example of this", > "twisted.internet is just right for this task", and the like. Certainly, mentions of free software like Twisted should always be ok. For proprietary products including books, there's a bit more conflict; I'd say it's best to be a bit judicious about plugging such products, but beyond the call of duty to completely stop mentioning them.
- Previous message (by thread): mention of books & extensions welcome, or...? (was Re: Scripting *of* Python)
- Next message (by thread): mention of books & extensions welcome, or...? (was Re: Scripting *of* Python)
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the Python-list mailing list