Comments on base52 encoder/decoder ?
Erik Max Francis
max at alcyone.com
Wed Jan 8 20:20:07 EST 2003
More information about the Python-list mailing list
Wed Jan 8 20:20:07 EST 2003
- Previous message (by thread): Comments on base52 encoder/decoder ?
- Next message (by thread): Comments on base52 encoder/decoder ?
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Paul Rubin wrote: > I'd vote for getting rid of the fancy stuff with the integer codes, > and also making the odd-character the last character in the encoded > string rather than the first. The reason is that lets you encode a > stream where you don't know the length in advance. Agreed on all counts. It should stay at the simple binary -> base52 encoding and, obviously, the reverse operation. -- Erik Max Francis / max at alcyone.com / http://www.alcyone.com/max/ __ San Jose, CA, USA / 37 20 N 121 53 W / &tSftDotIotE / \ Strange is our situation here upon earth. \__/ Albert Einstein ZOE / http://www.alcyone.com/pyos/zoe/ A simple Python OpenGL rendering engine.
- Previous message (by thread): Comments on base52 encoder/decoder ?
- Next message (by thread): Comments on base52 encoder/decoder ?
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the Python-list mailing list