The "beaty" of date arithmetic
Eddie Corns
eddie at holyrood.ed.ac.uk
Fri Jan 24 06:41:23 EST 2003
More information about the Python-list mailing list
Fri Jan 24 06:41:23 EST 2003
- Previous message (by thread): The "beaty" of date arithmetic
- Next message (by thread): The "beaty" of date arithmetic
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
hjwidmaier at web.de (Hans-Joachim Widmaier) writes: >I've considered using mxDateTime, but from looking at the docs, I >haven't found anything that seemed to make it much easier. The >problems start as soon as you're going from fixed units like hour, day >to somewhat fuzzier like month. What date is "T - 1 month - 1 day"? >What date is "2000-02-29 + 1 year"? Date arithmetic *is* complex. Most >of the ugliness IMHO stems from the tuple-list conversions and >numerical indices. (Sure, I could have created names for them, making >this little thing even longer.) mxDateTime handles this and more. Check the examples under the RelativeDateTime section. As for Feb 29 + 1 year: >>> from mx.DateTime import * >>> ld = strptime('2000-02-29','%Y-%m-%d') >>> ld <DateTime object for '2000-02-29 00:00:00.00' at 8129ec8> >>> ld + RelativeDateTime (years=+1) <DateTime object for '2001-03-01 00:00:00.00' at 815cf80> >>> od = strptime('2000-03-01','%Y-%m-%d') >>> od <DateTime object for '2000-03-01 00:00:00.00' at 8171180> >>> od + RelativeDateTime (years=+1) <DateTime object for '2001-03-01 00:00:00.00' at 8170d60> Seems a reasonable interpretation to me. I'm hard to please and I consider mxDateTime to be "good"! Eddie
- Previous message (by thread): The "beaty" of date arithmetic
- Next message (by thread): The "beaty" of date arithmetic
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the Python-list mailing list