Efficiency: list or tuple?
Gonçalo Rodrigues
op73418 at mail.telepac.pt
Wed Jan 15 12:54:08 EST 2003
More information about the Python-list mailing list
Wed Jan 15 12:54:08 EST 2003
- Previous message (by thread): Efficiency: list or tuple?
- Next message (by thread): Efficiency: list or tuple?
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
On 15 Jan 2003 17:32:25 GMT, Spencer Ernest Doidge <spencer at efn.org> wrote: >I'm interested in putting pairs of integers and floats into a sequence >of indeterminate length. >I'm collecting this data in real time, and I want to use the most efficient >available method so as to be able to gather data as fast as possible and >append it to the sequence as I go. >As far as I can tell, I have lists and tuples to choose from. >Does either of these structures work better in this situation, or is >there some other way I don't know about? Tuples are immutable, so you don't even have the append method available. I suppose this does not leave much choice, heh? Depending on what you want to do, you could also consider dictionaries (or sets in 2.3). With my best regards, G. Rodrigues
- Previous message (by thread): Efficiency: list or tuple?
- Next message (by thread): Efficiency: list or tuple?
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the Python-list mailing list