Jeff Epler jepler at unpythonic.net
Sat Jun 7 17:24:06 EDT 2003

• Previous message (by thread): Porridge 0.0
• Next message (by thread): Anyone heard of using pyunit to drive security audit?
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

---

On Thu, Jun 05, 2003 at 02:51:34PM -0700, Scott David Daniels wrote:
> Ed Avis wrote:
> 
> >Ben Finney <bignose-hates-spam at and-zip-does-too.com.au> writes:
> >>Building on the success of Python to date, Porridge will correct 
> >>all the flaws that have been raised by opponents of Python.
> >... Oh, and put goto in there as well, it is sorely missed.
> Clearly this is _not_ what we want "goto" is confirmed terrible.
> I suggest we use the Knuth-defined (bow, scrape) "comefrom" and
> "computed comefrom" statement. [...]

Hm, how about we beat Intercal to implementing the 'PLEASE GO AWAY'
statement?

---

• Previous message (by thread): Porridge 0.0
• Next message (by thread): Anyone heard of using pyunit to drive security audit?
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

---

More information about the Python-list mailing list