Possible PEP: Improve classmethod/staticmethod syntax
Bernhard Herzog
bh at intevation.de
Wed Jun 4 12:27:21 EDT 2003
More information about the Python-list mailing list
Wed Jun 4 12:27:21 EDT 2003
- Previous message (by thread): Possible PEP: Improve classmethod/staticmethod syntax
- Next message (by thread): Possible PEP: Improve classmethod/staticmethod syntax
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Skip Montanaro <skip at pobox.com> writes: > To > use lists there you have to extend list constructor syntax somehow, as I > used in my original message: > > def foo(...) [pre=foo_pre, post=foo_post]: > <normal code here> Not really. You could just do it like this: def foo(...) [pre(foo_pre), post(foo_post)]: <normal code here> pre and post would be functions that take a function implementing the pre or postcondition and return a function that when called with a function object add the pre/post condition to the function. E.g. def pre(precondition): def install_pre_condition(function): def call_with_precondition(*args, **kw): precondition(*args, **kw) # or however the precondition is called return function(*args, **kw) return call_with_precondition return install_pre_condition Bernhard -- Intevation GmbH http://intevation.de/ Sketch http://sketch.sourceforge.net/ MapIt! http://www.mapit.de/
- Previous message (by thread): Possible PEP: Improve classmethod/staticmethod syntax
- Next message (by thread): Possible PEP: Improve classmethod/staticmethod syntax
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the Python-list mailing list