Proposed extension to file constructor
Taral
taral at taral.net
Tue Jun 3 14:28:13 EDT 2003
More information about the Python-list mailing list
Tue Jun 3 14:28:13 EDT 2003
- Previous message (by thread): Proposed extension to file constructor
- Next message (by thread): Proposed extension to file constructor
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
I needed to extend popen functionality, so I modified the file constructor to optionally take a file descriptor. It was, in my opinion, the minimum way to do it while preserving isinstance(x, file). The full discussion and patch is on sourceforge at https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=305470&aid=608182&group_id=5470 -- but someone said I should ask here to solicit comment on it. Anyone? -- Taral <taral at taral.net> This message is digitally signed. Please PGP encrypt mail to me. "Most parents have better things to do with their time than take care of their children." -- Me -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: not available Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 196 bytes Desc: not available URL: <http://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-list/attachments/20030603/52376b60/attachment.sig>
- Previous message (by thread): Proposed extension to file constructor
- Next message (by thread): Proposed extension to file constructor
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the Python-list mailing list