XML
Paul Boddie
paul at boddie.net
Tue Jun 24 05:21:20 EDT 2003
More information about the Python-list mailing list
Tue Jun 24 05:21:20 EDT 2003
- Previous message (by thread): XML
- Next message (by thread): XML
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Roman Suzi <rnd at onego.ru> wrote in message news:<mailman.1056387220.30017.python-list at python.org>... > > OK. When I was talking about plain text, I had in mind that it > has some proprietary format. For example, I can easily write: > > ------------------ > foo = "123" > bar = "456" > zoo = "la\"lala" > ------------------ > > And it's not very hard to parse that. Well, you can just write that in a module and have Python import it. ;-) And I don't see anything wrong with that, actually. In various situations, particularly the oft-quoted configuration file example, this is a lot more interesting than XML, for Python applications at least. > In case of XML I will need something like > > <?xml version="1.0"?> > <foo>123</foo><bar>456</bar><zoo>la"lala</zoo> > > - not a big deal, but it's harder to parse. And also XML software keeps > changing (or so it seems), and this gives a sense of instability. How hard is it to call a parse function on some XML module? (Bearing in mind that your example isn't a well-formed XML document since it doesn't have a single root element, even though I do like using "zoo" elements in examples myself. :-) ) > XML always gives me a feeling that I do not fully master it (especially it's > DTD part)! And this is after two years of trying to understand it. (Cf: with > Python felt at home after a week or two!) It can often be a question of ambition, since I can imagine that many people don't really use DTDs or XML Schemas to get their work done. In any case, it isn't clear what the corresponding technology to DTD is in the Python environment - optional, but not yet invented, static type annotations? > P.S. Just look at the neighboor thread: > Subject: minidom toxml() not emitting attribute namespace qualifier > > > Using Python 2.2.3, with this example code: > > [Code elided] > > > The output is missing the "myns" namespace qualifier on the "att" > > attribute. Can someone tell me what I'm doing wrong? Could be that if one is calling setAttributeNS on an element, one has to specify the prefix as part of the name parameter - that isn't obvious and I made that mistake before I became more acquainted with the API. > That's a bug in minidom. > > I reported it back in November 2002, but I wasn't precise enough about version > numbers, so it went unaddressed. Well, I was convinced about the bug status until I looked deeper and realised that I was doing stuff wrong. Perhaps it's a documentation issue, and perhaps the maintainers of PyXML really have a lot of work to do, and perhaps it isn't easy to maintain various standard API implementations (as Andrew Kuchling suggests), but I do believe that the various XML technologies available for Python are very useful things to be familiar with, despite what people may claim. It may be the case that you don't see a need for XML in your work. In my opinion it's completely acceptable to not use XML if you find it completely irrelevant, unfathomable or opaque, but I respect your desire to become aware of what the technology can offer. I'm reminded of the occasional article written by people who ask others to "convince me why I should run Linux" - the only useful response is that if one can't see a need to try it without writing a public document asking others to persuade them, then they probably shouldn't be spending too much time worrying about it. Paul
- Previous message (by thread): XML
- Next message (by thread): XML
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the Python-list mailing list