a = b = 1 just syntactic sugar?
Ed Avis
ed at membled.com
Sat Jun 7 16:44:04 EDT 2003
More information about the Python-list mailing list
Sat Jun 7 16:44:04 EDT 2003
- Previous message (by thread): a = b = 1 just syntactic sugar?
- Next message (by thread): a = b = 1 just syntactic sugar?
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Steven Taschuk <staschuk at telusplanet.net> writes: >Ignoring the problems due this just being an example, and >concentrating just on the question of lambda's restrictions, I >don't see why you can't just use def: > > def maybe_unify(x, y): > if x == y: > def change(X): > pass > elif x == []: > def change(X): > X.extend(y) > else: > change = None > return change Yes - I don't know why I didn't think of that. Thanks for the suggestion. Of course it seems a little clunky to define these functions with a name that is then never used except to return them anonymously, but it should work. -- Ed Avis <ed at membled.com>
- Previous message (by thread): a = b = 1 just syntactic sugar?
- Next message (by thread): a = b = 1 just syntactic sugar?
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the Python-list mailing list