why 'lambda' and 'reduce'?
Manuel Garcia
news at manuelmgarcia.com
Thu Jun 12 20:28:11 EDT 2003
More information about the Python-list mailing list
Thu Jun 12 20:28:11 EDT 2003
- Previous message (by thread): why 'lambda' and 'reduce'?
- Next message (by thread): why 'lambda' and 'reduce'?
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
On Thu, 12 Jun 2003 17:09:37 -0600, Steven Taschuk <staschuk at telusplanet.net> wrote: >(It prints the first 5000 digits of pi, by the way. At least, it >seems to. The first thirty digits are right, at least, and the >algorithm is based on a sound plan. The only question is whether >the arithmetic error and hardcoded recurrence-iteration limits >affect more than ten digits (which is what the code allows for). I shouldn't feed a troll, but this reply is just too delicious. The author claims the code is unobfuscated, but the nature of how all 5000 digits are kept accurate are obfuscated from him. >Determining *that* would require someone who actually knows >something about numerical analysis, which I do not.) Now you're saying something! ;-) Manuel
- Previous message (by thread): why 'lambda' and 'reduce'?
- Next message (by thread): why 'lambda' and 'reduce'?
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the Python-list mailing list