Python Cannot be Killed
Alexander Schmolck
a.schmolck at gmx.net
Thu Jun 19 22:05:56 EDT 2003
More information about the Python-list mailing list
Thu Jun 19 22:05:56 EDT 2003
- Previous message (by thread): Python Cannot be Killed
- Next message (by thread): Python Cannot be Killed
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Cliff Wells <LogiplexSoftware at earthlink.net> writes: > > Anyway, my point being that no matter how one might feel about > Stallman's views, I don't think anyone can cast any real doubt on his > integrity. Not that my aim is to cast any real doubt on Stallman's integrity, but why can't I? > If the GPL changes, it will be to bring the letter in line with the spirit, > not to strip authors or users of their protections or rights. While it seems indeed unlikely that the FSF will *maliciously* modify the GPL in a way that doesn't reflect the aims of authors of GPL'ed software, it is far less of a stretch to assume that the FSF could make changes that some authors would feel rather unhappy about. Indeed the probability of the FSF changing licenses in such a fashion seems to be 1, judging by recent FDL issues: (<http://lists.debian.org/debian-legal/2003/debian-legal-200304/msg00256.html>) > Yes, it *is* a matter of trust. But then so is running any software you > didn't personally write, trusting users not to copy your software > illegally or the clerk at the store to give you the right change. > Despite appearances, the world runs on trust. Let me remind you that I brought this up in the context of a zealot's claim that only the GPL "guarantees anything", whereas other licenses don't, which is patently false, even in the wider sense that BSD/MIT style licenses require faith in others' whereas GPL doesn't. Me, personally, I'd under most circumstances rather place my trust on my licensees under the simple terms of a license like MIT which I both fully control and understand than on RMS's/the FSF's ability to judge what will be right for me, my code and the world in general. No doubt there are plenty of cases where the GPL is a good choice, but I find that sort of advocacy that tries to convince you that only the GPL can be "trusted" and promotes "freedom" a bit irritating. > For various reasons, I happen to trust people in the Open Source world more > than others and will continue to do so until proven wrong. I appreciate your trust ;) 'as
- Previous message (by thread): Python Cannot be Killed
- Next message (by thread): Python Cannot be Killed
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the Python-list mailing list