closure
David Mertz
mertz at gnosis.cx
Tue Mar 25 12:33:52 EST 2003
More information about the Python-list mailing list
Tue Mar 25 12:33:52 EST 2003
- Previous message (by thread): closure
- Next message (by thread): closure
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
|> David Mertz's articles on functional programming in Python "xam" <ma at Bell.com> wrote previously: |The articles (and the referred-to Xoltar toolkit) implied |that 2.1 will have much better native support for closure. Since 2.1 has |been out for a while I wanted to see how those feature proposals turned out. It's been a while since I wrote those articles. But I think what I had in mind was simply the inclusion of nested scoping as default behavior. That happened, of course. But Python has not added anything closure-specific like a "closure" keyword, or special syntax... there are threads here every once in a while where someone proposes such a thing, but I think it is unlikely to happen. Yours, David... -- mertz@ _/_/_/_/_/_/_/ THIS MESSAGE WAS BROUGHT TO YOU BY:_/_/_/_/ v i gnosis _/_/ Postmodern Enterprises _/_/ s r .cx _/_/ MAKERS OF CHAOS.... _/_/ i u _/_/_/_/_/ LOOK FOR IT IN A NEIGHBORHOOD NEAR YOU_/_/_/_/_/ g s
- Previous message (by thread): closure
- Next message (by thread): closure
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the Python-list mailing list