Testing for a list
John Baxter
jwbaxter at spamcop.net
Tue Mar 11 01:17:08 EST 2003
More information about the Python-list mailing list
Tue Mar 11 01:17:08 EST 2003
- Previous message (by thread): Testing for a list
- Next message (by thread): Testing for a list
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
In article <mailman.1047326057.17831.python-list at python.org>, "Antun Karlovac" <antun at antunkarlovac.com> wrote: > I guess you're right. For this particular application, I could just always > have a > list, even if it's only got one item in it. And, in some situations, if you get a non-list (by whichever of the various meanings is most useful), you can turn what you got into a one-item list containing what you got and press on. Whether that's appropriate depends on the problem. --John
- Previous message (by thread): Testing for a list
- Next message (by thread): Testing for a list
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the Python-list mailing list