OT: polyamory (was Re: [OT] Re: Python training time)
Tim Peters
tim_one at email.msn.com
Thu Mar 6 00:30:21 EST 2003
More information about the Python-list mailing list
Thu Mar 6 00:30:21 EST 2003
- Previous message (by thread): OT: polyamory (was Re: [OT] Re: Python training time)
- Next message (by thread): OT: polyamory (was Re: [OT] Re: Python training time)
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
[Anna] [Aahz] > Yup. For some reason, overall alt.poly is even better than c.l.py at > resisting trolls and flamefests. Besides, at this point I wouldn't be > surprised if there were more poly people than Pythonistas, although I'm > working to change that. ;-) Editorial note: Guido does not officially support the attempted extermination of any group just to increase the number of Pythonistas relative to that group. Or perhaps it's just the death of humans he objects to? Whichever, I get in trouble whenever I try it, so don't. [Anna] > Well yes, but how many of us poly Pythonistas are there? Undoubtedly more than you think. For example, Dutch people used to be shy about posting here, until several rigorous proofs established that all comp.lang.python posters are Dutch (notwithstanding that some posters have suppressed memories of their true origins). Goodness, even bots are welcomed here! From a bot's POV, all humans are poly -- or at least all those who love all those who don't love themselves. it-takes-a-bot-to-love-a-bot-ly y'rs - tim
- Previous message (by thread): OT: polyamory (was Re: [OT] Re: Python training time)
- Next message (by thread): OT: polyamory (was Re: [OT] Re: Python training time)
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the Python-list mailing list