Vote on PEP 308: Ternary Operator
Sabby and Tabby
sabbyxtabby at yahoo.com
Tue Mar 4 05:06:44 EST 2003
More information about the Python-list mailing list
Tue Mar 4 05:06:44 EST 2003
- Previous message (by thread): Vote on PEP 308: Ternary Operator
- Next message (by thread): Vote on PEP 308: Ternary Operator
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Sheila King <usenet at thinkspot.net> wrote: > No, the below is not my vote. I'd certainly rather you hadn't put my name > in such a bogus example, as who knows what people will make of it at a > later time on Usenet. I've removed my name from the quoted example below. Sincerest apologies. The inclusion of your name is so obviously wrong in hindsight. No offence was intended. -- Tabby
- Previous message (by thread): Vote on PEP 308: Ternary Operator
- Next message (by thread): Vote on PEP 308: Ternary Operator
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the Python-list mailing list