Dave Brueck dave at pythonapocrypha.com
Mon Mar 10 22:46:39 EST 2003

• Previous message (by thread): Summary of PEP 308 Vote for a Ternary Operator
• Next message (by thread): Summary of PEP 308 Vote for a Ternary Operator
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

---

On Mon, 10 Mar 2003, Raymond Hettinger wrote:

> The PEP 308 vote is summarized at:
>   http://tinyurl.com/763f

Thanks for going to all the trouble Raymond!

>   Some of the no-change votes included strong pleas.  This will
>   certainly be a consideration.

Why?

Thanks again,
-Dave

---

• Previous message (by thread): Summary of PEP 308 Vote for a Ternary Operator
• Next message (by thread): Summary of PEP 308 Vote for a Ternary Operator
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

---

More information about the Python-list mailing list