The ternary operator: more than one way to do it?
Paul Boddie
paul at boddie.net
Wed Mar 12 06:04:12 EST 2003
More information about the Python-list mailing list
Wed Mar 12 06:04:12 EST 2003
- Previous message (by thread): The ternary operator: more than one way to do it?
- Next message (by thread): The ternary operator: more than one way to do it?
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Thomas Wouters <thomas at xs4all.net> wrote in message news:<mailman.1047379577.28489.python-list at python.org>... > > And the point wasn't that the single feature of ?: (or whatever the syntax > would be) would result in this, but 'when do you stop adding features' or > 'when does the weight of new features outweigh the weight of a new feature'. In other words: when should one stop adding sugar and just eat the dessert? Paul
- Previous message (by thread): The ternary operator: more than one way to do it?
- Next message (by thread): The ternary operator: more than one way to do it?
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the Python-list mailing list