recursion vs iteration (was Re: reduce()--what is it good for?)
David Eppstein
eppstein at ics.uci.edu
Mon Nov 10 01:17:12 EST 2003
More information about the Python-list mailing list
Mon Nov 10 01:17:12 EST 2003
- Previous message (by thread): recursion vs iteration (was Re: reduce()--what is it good for?)
- Next message (by thread): recursion vs iteration
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
In article <bon9t6$ndl$0 at 216.39.172.122>, bokr at oz.net (Bengt Richter) wrote: > I played with fibonacci and was quite proud of myself for having > probably rediscovered a fast recursion algorithm for it > (about this time 1996 it seems, sheesh time flies) : > > in scheme > > http://groups.google.com/groups?selm=52s6qm%24rdp%40kanga.accessone.com&output > =gplain > > and later I translated it to python > > http://groups.google.com/groups?selm=3b4a468d.1494788532%40wa.news.verio.net&o > utput=gplain > > Perhaps you know of a similar predecessor? You're in good company, this looks pretty similar to or the same as the one rediscovered by Dijkstra in http://www.cs.utexas.edu/users/EWD/ewd06xx/EWD654.PDF (bottom of page 1). He called it "well-known" in 1978 but I'm not familiar with earlier references. -- David Eppstein http://www.ics.uci.edu/~eppstein/ Univ. of California, Irvine, School of Information & Computer Science
- Previous message (by thread): recursion vs iteration (was Re: reduce()--what is it good for?)
- Next message (by thread): recursion vs iteration
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the Python-list mailing list