Python's simplicity philosophy
Andrew Dalke
adalke at mindspring.com
Fri Nov 14 17:30:55 EST 2003
More information about the Python-list mailing list
Fri Nov 14 17:30:55 EST 2003
- Previous message (by thread): Python's simplicity philosophy
- Next message (by thread): Python's simplicity philosophy
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Alex: > Anyway, computational scientists using Python should be using Numeric > (if they aren't, they're sadly misguided). Or they are like me and work in a subfield where (specialized) database searches and graph theory is more useful. It was strange at SciPy with all those people using NumPy and doing CFD and our little group of computational life sciences people being rather bored. > Indeed, that's why 'sum' is a commonly used word in English -- exactly > because nobody's every DOING anything like that -- while, of course, > 'reduce' is totally obvious -- why, _anybody_ who's ever taken > Chemistry 101 knows it means "to remove oxygen"! While in Chemistry 102 they learn that it means to add electrons and can occur in a non-oxygen environment ;) http://reference.allrefer.com/encyclopedia/O/oxidreduc.html Andrew dalke at dalkescientific.com
- Previous message (by thread): Python's simplicity philosophy
- Next message (by thread): Python's simplicity philosophy
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the Python-list mailing list