oops: correction to "question on precision" post
John Benson
jsbenson at bensonsystems.com
Mon Nov 17 14:46:30 EST 2003
More information about the Python-list mailing list
Mon Nov 17 14:46:30 EST 2003
- Previous message (by thread): Variable interpolation question
- Next message (by thread): Python 2.3, win32all-157, AttributeError: wdFormatText
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
I got the multiplication precision rule wrong: relative precision is defined as the uncertainty divided by the magnitude of the measured quantity, e.g. 10 meters +/- 1 meter gives an uncertainty of 1 meter, and a relative precision of 1/10 or 10% The rule is that the relative precision of the multiplication is the sum of the relative precisions of the factors. When we square 10 +/- 1 meters to find the square area corresponding to that side, we get 100 square meters with a relative precision of 1/10 + 1/10 or a 20% relative precision of the 100 square meter result, which squares (sorry) with the +/- 20 range computed by squaring the range 9 through 11 meters for a squared area range of 81 through 121 square meters. The problem still remains, though, that the midpoint of the squared range is 101, and not 100! -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-list/attachments/20031117/e44b96dd/attachment.html>
- Previous message (by thread): Variable interpolation question
- Next message (by thread): Python 2.3, win32all-157, AttributeError: wdFormatText
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the Python-list mailing list