GIL risky for threading and networking? (was Re: good book on multithreaded programming with Python)
Nick Vargish
nav+posts at bandersnatch.org
Thu Nov 20 09:45:39 EST 2003
More information about the Python-list mailing list
Thu Nov 20 09:45:39 EST 2003
- Previous message (by thread): GIL risky for threading and networking? (was Re: good book on multithreaded programming with Python)
- Next message (by thread): This is getting ridiculous (Re: PyQt, Qt, Windows and Linux)
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Peter Hansen <peter at engcorp.com> writes: > Is this a case of fear arising out of ignorance? Most probably. On the other hand, I probably wouldn't have spoken up if I hadn't seen the post I replied to. I am planning on as pure Python an approach as possible, and have been from the start. I certainly wasn't trying to borrow trouble from the future or optimize too early in development. > If you have specific reasons for the concern, please provide them so > we can address them. This is the attitude that makes me tell my boss(es) that I get better support from the open source community than I ever could from a commercial outfit. Thanks! > The GIL certainly doesn't get in the way of > soft real-time work in any way that's significant. I'm going to proceed with that expectation, thanks again. Nick -- # sigmask || 0.2 || 20030107 || public domain || feed this to a python print reduce(lambda x,y:x+chr(ord(y)-1),' Ojdl!Wbshjti!=obwAcboefstobudi/psh?')
- Previous message (by thread): GIL risky for threading and networking? (was Re: good book on multithreaded programming with Python)
- Next message (by thread): This is getting ridiculous (Re: PyQt, Qt, Windows and Linux)
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the Python-list mailing list