python a bust?
Ben Finney
bignose-hates-spam at and-benfinney-does-too.id.au
Fri Nov 14 07:24:13 EST 2003
More information about the Python-list mailing list
Fri Nov 14 07:24:13 EST 2003
- Previous message (by thread): python a bust?
- Next message (by thread): python a bust?
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
On Fri, 14 Nov 2003 06:28:24 -0600, A.M. Kuchling wrote: > There's a finite number of dollars being spent on general Python books Your calculations imply that increasing the number of books available on a topic does not increase the amount of money spent on books on that topic. What evidence do you have for this? How do you account for contrary evidence, such as the evident thought processes of many (not least the OP of this thread) that "more books on X => more interest in X => I should buy books on X"? -- \ "Why was I with her? She reminds me of you. In fact, she | `\ reminds me more of you than you do!" -- Groucho Marx | _o__) | Ben Finney <http://bignose.squidly.org/>
- Previous message (by thread): python a bust?
- Next message (by thread): python a bust?
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the Python-list mailing list