python a bust?
Brandon J. Van Every
try_vanevery_at_mycompanyname at yahoo.com
Fri Nov 14 21:01:11 EST 2003
More information about the Python-list mailing list
Fri Nov 14 21:01:11 EST 2003
- Previous message (by thread): python a bust?
- Next message (by thread): python a bust?
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
John J. Lee wrote: > pythonguy at Hotpop.com (Anand Pillai) writes: > [...] >> There might have been thousands of books published in C/C++ >> language and they have all helped to popularize it in one >> or the other way. Contrast, in the python world we have one >> Alex Martelli, one Wesley Chun, one David Mertz, really >> countable by hand. > > And thank heavens for that. Most books on C++ (and the same goes for > all kinds of other technical subjects) actually do nothing other to > make it harder to find the decent books. Ironically, the good books > often seem to get published first, followed afterwards by a glut of > awful ones jumping on the bandwagon. So much for competition... But the questions are: 1) do the "crappy" books sell briskly to someone? 2) is a plethora of books a healthy sign for a language? -- Cheers, www.indiegamedesign.com Brandon Van Every Seattle, WA Brandon's Law (after Godwin's Law): "As a Usenet discussion grows longer, the probability of a person being called a troll approaches one RAPIDLY."
- Previous message (by thread): python a bust?
- Next message (by thread): python a bust?
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the Python-list mailing list