ANN: ActivePython 2.3.2 & ActivePython 2.2.3
Thomas Heller
theller at python.net
Tue Nov 4 13:22:05 EST 2003
More information about the Python-list mailing list
Tue Nov 4 13:22:05 EST 2003
- Previous message (by thread): ANN: ActivePython 2.3.2 & ActivePython 2.2.3
- Next message (by thread): Rekall not longer available from theKompany.com - a fabrication
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Alex Martelli <aleax at aleax.it> writes: > Thomas Heller wrote: > ... >>> * Drop all registry stuff, using a few .pth files >> >> One .pth file is probably enough. > > Sure, because one .pth file can list as many directories as you > want (one per line) -- just spelling this out for readers who > may not be entirely familiar with .pth files. Yes. Given the recent questions here on this list about how to set PYTHONPATH (which I never bothered to answer) for me the .pth files are an attractive alternative to env vars. For win32all, however, the question is: why not switch to a standard directory structure? For example, install win32api.pyd in Lib/site-packages instead of a win32 subdirectory. The more radical approach of converting it into packages is probably too painful for existing code... Thomas
- Previous message (by thread): ANN: ActivePython 2.3.2 & ActivePython 2.2.3
- Next message (by thread): Rekall not longer available from theKompany.com - a fabrication
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the Python-list mailing list