syntax philosophy
Tuang
tuanglen at hotmail.com
Tue Nov 18 15:32:44 EST 2003
More information about the Python-list mailing list
Tue Nov 18 15:32:44 EST 2003
- Previous message (by thread): syntax philosophy
- Next message (by thread): syntax philosophy
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
bokr at oz.net (Bengt Richter) wrote > > IMO Python is a very good Swiss Army Knife. If you think you have a pattern > that you will want to re-use, then it is pretty easy to make something to > hide the stuff you want as default, and leave out some unnecessaries. E.g., > if you want histograms, it's easy to make a histogram class that will > take a word sequence and give you a histogram object that will do what you want, > and that you can add to as your requirements change. E.g., [...lots of useful stuff for me to copy for future reference...] Thanks! I appreciate your examples of how easy it is to create abstractions somewhat above the level of the built-ins for future reuse. It can be done in Perl too, of course, but it appears to be so much more convenient in Python that I think I actually will start assembling a bunch of prebuilt tools of this sort to put in a standard module of my own (my personal toolbox). As I said, it can be done in Perl, too, but it's just difficult enough that I never quite bothered to do it. I definitely like this aspect of Python.
- Previous message (by thread): syntax philosophy
- Next message (by thread): syntax philosophy
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the Python-list mailing list