Python parser generators
François Pinard
pinard at iro.umontreal.ca
Fri Nov 28 12:24:02 EST 2003
More information about the Python-list mailing list
Fri Nov 28 12:24:02 EST 2003
- Previous message (by thread): Python parser generators
- Next message (by thread): Python parser generators
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
[anton muhin] > Can someone give an overview of existing Python parser generators? > [...] I'm rather looking for convenience and expressiveness. Hello, Anton. I looked at a few, but did not look at them all, and finally settled for SPARK for production. (I do not fully understand why a few generators which were written after SPARK did not at least recycle its elegance.) SPARK is not blazing fast, but is not inordinately slow either, _given_ you write reasonable grammars. By "reasonable", I do not mean small, we indeed use some rather big ones here. But I mean grammars which are rather left-to-right-ly, and for which big inputs could be chumped into smaller syntactical units at lexical time. In that way, each of the repeated call to a SPARK parser in an application is not given the whole input -- we found out that this is worth, and usually easy to do. Our parsers are easy to maintain and very dependable. We are happy with it. -- François Pinard http://www.iro.umontreal.ca/~pinard
- Previous message (by thread): Python parser generators
- Next message (by thread): Python parser generators
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the Python-list mailing list