Why don't people like lisp?
Lulu of the Lotus-Eaters
mertz at gnosis.cx
Mon Oct 20 14:52:18 EDT 2003
More information about the Python-list mailing list
Mon Oct 20 14:52:18 EDT 2003
- Previous message (by thread): Why don't people like lisp?
- Next message (by thread): Why don't people like lisp?
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Pascal Costanza <costanza at web.de> wrote previously: |Wouldn't it be better if everyone could contribute to the evolution of a |language, and then let the community decide what the best approaches are? I can think of almost nothing worse than this! Well, "design-by-committee" results like XSLT are even worse. But the "benevolent dictator" model is VASTLY better than the "let 1000 flowers bloom" approach. Incidentally, I have never seen--and expect never to see--some new mysterious domain where Python is too limited because the designers did not forsee the problem area. Nor similarly with other very high level languages. It NEVER happens that you just cannot solve a problem because of the lack of some novel syntax to do so... that's what libraries are for. Yours, Lulu... -- Keeping medicines from the bloodstreams of the sick; food from the bellies of the hungry; books from the hands of the uneducated; technology from the underdeveloped; and putting advocates of freedom in prisons. Intellectual property is to the 21st century what the slave trade was to the 16th.
- Previous message (by thread): Why don't people like lisp?
- Next message (by thread): Why don't people like lisp?
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the Python-list mailing list