Python from Wise Guy's Viewpoint
Duncan Booth
duncan at NOSPAMrcp.co.uk
Tue Oct 21 04:24:09 EDT 2003
More information about the Python-list mailing list
Tue Oct 21 04:24:09 EDT 2003
- Previous message (by thread): Python from Wise Guy's Viewpoint
- Next message (by thread): Python from Wise Guy's Viewpoint
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Alex Martelli <aleax at aleax.it> wrote in news:OwOkb.19485$e5.710958 at news1.tin.it: > Yes -- which is exactly why many non-programmers would prefer the > parentheses-less notation -- with more obvious names of course;-). > E.g.: > emitwarning URGENT "meltdown imminent!!!" > DOES look nicer to non-programmers than > emitwarning(URGENT, "meltdown imminent!!!") > > Indeed, such languages as Visual Basic and Ruby do allow calling > without parentheses, no doubt because of this "nice look" thing. I know we are agreed that Visual Basic is fundamentally broken, but it might be worth pointing out the massive trap that it provides for programmers in the subtle difference between: someProcedure x and someProcedure(x) and call someProcedure(x) If 'someProcedure' is a procedure taking a single reference parameter, and modifying that parameter, then the first and third forms will call the procedure and modify 'x'. The second form on the other hand will call the procedure and without any warning or error will simply discard the modifications leaving 'x' unchanged. -- Duncan Booth duncan at rcp.co.uk int month(char *p){return(124864/((p[0]+p[1]-p[2]&0x1f)+1)%12)["\5\x8\3" "\6\7\xb\1\x9\xa\2\0\4"];} // Who said my code was obscure?
- Previous message (by thread): Python from Wise Guy's Viewpoint
- Next message (by thread): Python from Wise Guy's Viewpoint
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the Python-list mailing list