PEP 289: Generator Expressions (please comment)
Daniel Dittmar
daniel at dittmar.net
Tue Oct 28 15:04:24 EST 2003
More information about the Python-list mailing list
Tue Oct 28 15:04:24 EST 2003
- Previous message (by thread): PEP 289: Generator Expressions (please comment)
- Next message (by thread): PEP 289: Generator Expressions (please comment)
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Alex Martelli wrote: > reasonable to form the working hypothesis that you LIKE perl syntax, > rather than being engaged in sarcasm against your own proposals (which > is a form of split personality one rarely comes upon). I don't like list comprehension when compared to Smalltalk code blocks, so I was really looking for a way to keep any additional 'comprehension' variants limited to one syntax rule. But it seems as if the current trend in Python is toward succinctness. To paraphrase one poster: 'It is documented, therefor it is explicit'. I try to keep quiet, enjoy the parts of Python I like and wait for the tide to turn. Daniel
- Previous message (by thread): PEP 289: Generator Expressions (please comment)
- Next message (by thread): PEP 289: Generator Expressions (please comment)
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the Python-list mailing list