Python is Considered Harmful
Isaac To
kkto at csis.hku.hk
Thu Oct 30 21:06:53 EST 2003
More information about the Python-list mailing list
Thu Oct 30 21:06:53 EST 2003
- Previous message (by thread): Python is Considered Harmful
- Next message (by thread): Python is Considered Harmful
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
>>>>> "Alan" == Alan Offer <alan_offer at hotmail.com> writes: Alan> Isaac To <kkto at csis.hku.hk> wrote in message Alan> news:<7ioew3xjh1.fsf at enark.csis.hku.hk>... >> I believe the behaviour can be fixed rather easily by some >> directives, say making it >> >> map(lambda f: f(1), [lambda x: x+(*i) for i in range(3)]) >> >> where the * construct would get the reference of i at function >> definition time rather than at function invocation time (anyone can >> point me to an PEP?). Alan> We can essentially do this by passing i to a function that then Alan> returns the desired function. So to make flist with the functions Alan> that mike420 wanted, we can use: Alan> flist = map(lambda i: (lambda x: x+i), range(3)) Alan> Now [f(1) for f in flist] is [1, 2, 3] as he expected. Ah... that means map(lambda f: f(1), [(lambda i: lambda x: x+i)(i) for i in range(3)]) Seems make sense to me. Regards, Isaac.
- Previous message (by thread): Python is Considered Harmful
- Next message (by thread): Python is Considered Harmful
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the Python-list mailing list