In need of c.l.p.discussion
Daniel Dittmar
daniel at dittmar.net
Thu Oct 16 16:42:20 EDT 2003
More information about the Python-list mailing list
Thu Oct 16 16:42:20 EDT 2003
- Previous message (by thread): In need of c.l.p.discussion
- Next message (by thread): In need of c.l.p.discussion
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Mark Jackson wrote: > Absent actual moderation your scheme depends on each poster deciding > whether his or her contribution constitutes "useful knowledge" or > "subjective opinion." I confidently predict that, if implemented, the > noise reduction which results will be swamped by the noise increase > occasioned by arguments over whether a particular posting was > misclassified or not. But couldn't we use SpamBayes for this? It probably wouldn't require much teaching so that any post containing 'ternary', 'lisp' or 'overloading assignment' goes straight to c.l.p.fistfights. Daniel
- Previous message (by thread): In need of c.l.p.discussion
- Next message (by thread): In need of c.l.p.discussion
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the Python-list mailing list