Python from Wise Guy's Viewpoint
Remi Vanicat
vanicat+invalid at labri.fr
Sat Oct 25 14:48:12 EDT 2003
More information about the Python-list mailing list
Sat Oct 25 14:48:12 EDT 2003
- Previous message (by thread): Python from Wise Guy's Viewpoint
- Next message (by thread): Python from Wise Guy's Viewpoint
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
gt5163b at prism.gatech.edu (Brian McNamara!) writes: > prunesquallor at comcast.net once said: >>Are they happy with something like this? >> >>(defun black-hole (x) >> #'black-hole) >> >>(for non lispers, the funny #' is a namespace operator. >> The black-hole function gobbles an argument and returns >> the black-hole function.) > > Finally, an example that I don't think you can type in Haskell. > You score a point for that. :) > > If we have a static type system which admits infinite types, then we > can assign black-hole a type. So it's still typeable, just not in any > common language I can name offhand. :) $ ocaml -rectypes Objective Caml version 3.07+2 # let rec f x = f;; val f : 'b -> 'a as 'a = <fun> By the way, I don't see how this function can be useful... -- Rémi Vanicat
- Previous message (by thread): Python from Wise Guy's Viewpoint
- Next message (by thread): Python from Wise Guy's Viewpoint
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the Python-list mailing list