Python from Wise Guy's Viewpoint
Pascal Costanza
costanza at web.de
Tue Oct 28 19:29:23 EST 2003
More information about the Python-list mailing list
Tue Oct 28 19:29:23 EST 2003
- Previous message (by thread): Python from Wise Guy's Viewpoint
- Next message (by thread): Python from Wise Guy's Viewpoint
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Matthias Blume wrote: > Pascal Costanza <costanza at web.de> writes: > > >>Matthias Blume wrote: >> >> >>>Pascal Costanza <costanza at web.de> writes: >> >>>>I think that Neelakantan has better examples for programs that are >>>>possible to write with a statically typed language, but not with >>>>dynamically typed ones. (Not 100% sure yet, though.) >>> >>>There are no such programs, obviously. You can always translate a >> >>>statically typed program into a dynamically typed one (and vice >>>versa). >> >>No, for christ's sake! There are dynamically typed programs that you >>cannot translate into statically typed ones! > > > Yes you can. (In the worst case scenario you lose all the benefits of > static typing. But a translation is *always* possible. After all, > dynamically typed programs are already statically typed in the trival > "one type fits all" sense.) No, that's not all you need to do. Essentially you would need to write a complete interpreter/compiler for the dynamically typed language on top of the statically typed one, _if_ you want runtime metaprogramming. That's not what I would call a straightforward translation. But this is really getting tiring. > [This whole discussion is entirely due to a mismatch of our notions of > what constitutes expressive power.] No, it's not. There's a class of programs that exhibit a certain behavior at runtime that you cannot write in a statically typed language _directly in the language itself_. There's no program that exhibits a certain behavior at runtime that you can only write in a statically typed language. [1] That's a fact that you simply don't want to admit. But you're objectively wrong here. However, the horse is beaten to death by now. Good bye. Pascal [11 Except perhaps for a class of programs that would change their runtime and/or space complexity, provided they would need lots of dynamic type checks. But I haven't sorted out yet whether this class really exists.
- Previous message (by thread): Python from Wise Guy's Viewpoint
- Next message (by thread): Python from Wise Guy's Viewpoint
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the Python-list mailing list