Why don't people like lisp?

Pascal Costanza costanza at web.de
Wed Oct 22 09:48:01 EDT 2003

Previous message (by thread): Why don't people like lisp?
Next message (by thread): Why don't people like lisp?
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

Ville Vainio wrote:

> Lisp might have a good future ahead of it if it was only competing
> againt C++, Java and others. Unfortunately for Lisp, other dynamic
> languages exist at the moment, and they yield greater
> productivity.

This is true for the things that are currently en vogue.

> Most bosses are more impressed with getting stuff done
> fast than getting it done slowly, using gimmicks that would have given
> you an A+ if it was a CS research project.

I have implemented an AOP extension for Lisp that took about a weekend 
to implement. The implementation is one page of Lisp code and is rather 
efficient (wrt usability and performance) because of macros.

I have heard rumors that the development of an AOP extension for Python 
would take considerably longer.

Pascal

-- 
Pascal Costanza               University of Bonn
mailto:costanza at web.de        Institute of Computer Science III
http://www.pascalcostanza.de  Römerstr. 164, D-53117 Bonn (Germany)

Previous message (by thread): Why don't people like lisp?
Next message (by thread): Why don't people like lisp?
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

More information about the Python-list mailing list