Python syntax in Lisp and Scheme
Pascal Costanza
costanza at web.de
Tue Oct 7 18:59:20 EDT 2003
More information about the Python-list mailing list
Tue Oct 7 18:59:20 EDT 2003
- Previous message (by thread): Python syntax in Lisp and Scheme
- Next message (by thread): Python syntax in Lisp and Scheme
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Corey Coughlin wrote: > I was never very fond of lisp. I guess I mean scheme technically, I > took the Ableson and Sussman course back in college, so that's what I > learned of scheme, lisp in general I've mostly used embedded in other > things. In general, it always seemed to me that a lot of the design > choices in lisp are driven more by elegance and simplicity than > usability. You should give Common Lisp a try. Many Lispers think that that's exactly one of the advantages of Common Lisp over Scheme: it focuses more on usability than on elegance. Of course, mileages vary, but you shouldn't draw conclusions about Common Lisp from your experience with Scheme, and vice versa. Common Lisp and Scheme are as similar as, say, C++ and Pascal. Pascal
- Previous message (by thread): Python syntax in Lisp and Scheme
- Next message (by thread): Python syntax in Lisp and Scheme
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the Python-list mailing list