Why don't people like lisp?
Kenny Tilton
ktilton at nyc.rr.com
Sun Oct 19 12:33:05 EDT 2003
More information about the Python-list mailing list
Sun Oct 19 12:33:05 EDT 2003
- Previous message (by thread): Why don't people like lisp?
- Next message (by thread): Why don't people like lisp?
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Terry Reedy wrote: > Lisp-aware editors do not solve the problem of reading Lisp code > embedded in text, as with OnLisp formatted .ps or .pdf. I agree. A big wadge of Lisp is not readable like NL text. And having seen Graham's MOSTN posted here, wow, that is really verbose lisp. With any Lisp, the indentation increment is just a few characters. I think one can extend that in many editors, but then the structured nature of functional code has one sailing off the right margin before too long. As for reading code, I do not do that in books much, and when I do they are pretty short examples. When they get bigger, right, I slow down and destructure mentally. For example, in MOSTN I saw the earliest few lines were just handling the edge case of a null input list. I moved a couple of levels into the tree and forgot that outer check (which was unnecessary!). I was recommending Chapter's 1 & 8 for well-written thoughts on the macro issue. -- http://tilton-technology.com What?! You are a newbie and you haven't answered my: http://alu.cliki.net/The%20Road%20to%20Lisp%20Survey
- Previous message (by thread): Why don't people like lisp?
- Next message (by thread): Why don't people like lisp?
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the Python-list mailing list