Why don't people like lisp?
Edi Weitz
edi at agharta.de
Wed Oct 22 10:29:17 EDT 2003
More information about the Python-list mailing list
Wed Oct 22 10:29:17 EDT 2003
- Previous message (by thread): Why don't people like lisp?
- Next message (by thread): Why don't people like lisp?
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
On Wed, 22 Oct 2003 13:31:25 GMT, Brian Downing <see-signature at lavos.net> wrote: > What you're missing is that in most implementations Lisp fixnums are > tagged so that they can fit in a descriptor slot by themselves and > not be boxed in more structure. In almost all (x86) implementations > I've seen a fixnum is 30 high bits of signed number and 2 low bits > of zero. Not in LispWorks (LW pro 4.2.7 on Linux x86), unfortunately: CL-USER 10 > (log most-positive-fixnum 2) 22.99999982801734 Does anybody have an idea why this is the case? Historical reasons? Thanks, Edi.
- Previous message (by thread): Why don't people like lisp?
- Next message (by thread): Why don't people like lisp?
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the Python-list mailing list